Starting it was nothing like the MSFS Check list with Mags on & Mixture Rich but maybe all DC3’s I ever flew had Electric Starters & 30 feet of Flame out of the Carbi if you got it wrong.Īll DC3’s in Australia had Fixed Cowl Flaps & no Blower (Apart from one Survey Aircraft). I have 1,600 hours on DC3’s (Both Pratt & Cyclone Engines, mainly the latter) 50 odd years ago & went strait from Bi-Planes & Cessna’s etc with no twin engine, Constant Speed Props or Retractable Gear as did all the trainees. And before you say it…I get it, it’s free, and that if I don’t like it, I don’t have to apply it. A stamp of approval on these mods before they are released by a real-world pilot of that aircraft should be somewhat of a requirement. But getting feedback from those that do, would be validating that the time we spend is actually as close of a simulation we can get to the real thing. Never being able to fly these planes IRL myself, I’ll never know. Does Asobo ever test and use these mods during Beta testing? I’d just like to know I’m moving towards making my sim experience of each plane more realistic opposed to not. I wish there was some sort of audit or control over these, in which case, you’d think Asobo would just implement those same updates…wouldn’t they? …so why don’t they out of interest for making their own sim better. If I’m not mistaken, none of McGouge’s or this recent one of Duckworks say they’ve been based on feedback from real world pilots of any aircraft, let alone the one they are doing the mod for… So why would we buy into one guy’s (the mod author) opinion that it’s more realistic or an enhancement. I wish when they introduce these mods there’s more of a convincing introduction.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |